1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, KRW 2,118,512 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from July 6, 2013 to May 27, 2016.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] Part 2, 13 and 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the "No. 9 of April 2013" as "No. 15, 2013."

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "from May 31, 2013 to "from May 16, 2013" in Part 15 of the judgment of the court of second instance.

Part IV of the decision of the first instance court "107,884,128 won (=530,442,00 won - 421,384,128 won)" shall be added to "107,884,128 won (=421,384,128 won - 313,50,000 won)".

The phrase “1) the parties’ assertion” and “2) determination on the cause of the claim” as stated in Part 4, Chapters 19 through 9, 11, of the decision of the court of first instance, shall be followed as follows.

1) The parties' assertion that the plaintiff supplied the defendant with 80T 14,804, 85T 640, and 185T 7,200 among propool material. As seen earlier, the plaintiff agreed to reduce the total price of the goods between the defendant and 530,442,00 to 421,384,128, and then received only 5 million won from the defendant, which had been already paid by 50,00,000 from 313,50,000, which had already been paid by 5,00,000 won. Thus, the defendant asserted that the defendant had the obligation to pay the plaintiff the total price of the goods to the defendant as 52,884,128 (=4,128 - 313,500,000 - 5,000,000) and damages for delay in the supply of the goods from 184,000,0000 won.