logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.15 2011가합103583
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 10, 2010, the Plaintiff was consulted with Defendant D at an E Hospital operated by the Defendants (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and was subject to the implementation of optical bones reduction surgery from around 09:05 to 11:00 on December 6, 2010 (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. The Plaintiff’s condition and the measures taken by the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital are as follows before the instant surgery is conducted.

At the time of the plaintiff, I would like to take measures of the medical staff of the defendant hospital in the state of the plaintiff 13:00

(b) 17:40 heads of the rooms in the process of taking a string to the rest of 15:00 strings, which are re-freshed and re-manufactured at the rest of 17:00 strings of the Jacks of the 15:0 strings of the Jacks of the 17:0 strings. In other words, the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of 18:0

b. The right angle decline that Defendant D will go to the toilet 19:00, while there is no significant change in 20:00 protruding trees, and the movement to starboard is weak compared to the left side and is about to continue to move without shouldering.

C. Around 21:00 on December 6, 2010, the Plaintiff was transferred from the Defendant Hospital to the Indones University Seoul White Hospital (hereinafter “Indones Hospital”) and arrived at the White Hospital around December 6, 2010.

As a result of brain test (CT) conducted at a white hospital, the brain side side side and cerebral blood from the left side side is observed, and the static dystrophism was implemented on December 7, 2010, but the dystrophism was implemented on or around December 8, 2010, but the dystrophism and dystrophism were re-rund on or around December 8, 2010.

E. The above cerebrovascular led to the Plaintiff’s decline in the right, the fall of the recognition function, the fall of the language ability, the fall of the two sides, and the failure to view the right side of the two sides.

【In the absence of any dispute, entry of Gap’s No. 4, 5, 6, 7, and Eul’s No. 1 (including spot numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply)

arrow