Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants came to know while working in the same workplace, and come to know of the victim C (n, 42 years of age) through the introduction of the branch, and Defendant B became aware of the introduction of Defendant A, and Defendant B also became aware of the fact, and he gets friendly and he gets friendly.

At around 00:30 on September 5, 2015, the Defendants: (a) laid down the front glass window of the EM7 car owned by the victim on the ground that the contact was cut off at the 5004 underground parking lot of the JM7 car owned by the victim, and (b) laid down the bitr glass, opened the bitr glass, and down the bitr glass with a kind of microfic pen.

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the victim's property amounting to KRW 3,295,037 and damaged its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (D Apartment images of CCTV in the underground parking lot, 5004-dong apartment);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (a letter of estimate for repair costs of damaged vehicles);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendants did not agree with the victim for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering the following: (a) the Defendants recognized their mistakes; (b) the Defendants were both initial offenders; and (c) paid out KRW 2,682,160 upon the claim for reimbursement by the insurer of the damaged vehicle; and (d) made efforts to recover from damage, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order shall be partially reduced and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.