1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. While working as a police officer of the Chungcheongbuk Provincial Police Agency on August 3, 2011, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of “influoral salt fluoral salt pan, humin salt , cerebral fluoral salt , both high-level salt pansiums, both sides, slots and salt pansiums, left-hand gates and salt pansiums, and plebings and chrosiums on the left side,” and provided medical care for official duties from August 3, 201 to September 7, 2011.

B. On November 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care additional to “the external trauma ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate (ebrate ebrate)” (hereinafter “ebrate ebrate ebrate”), and applied for the extension of the medical care period. However, the Defendant appears to have ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate eb

(hereinafter the Disposition in this case). [Grounds for recognition] The Disposition in this case does not dispute, Gap 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion was omitted due to the Plaintiff’s lack of knowledge as to whether the instant injury occurred at the time of the Plaintiff’s initial application for approval of medical care for official duties, and the instant injury and disease occurred or at least aggravated due to the instant accident.

Therefore, the instant disposition is unlawful on a different premise.

3. Determination

A. 1) At the time of filing an application for approval of medical care for the instant accident, the Plaintiff applied for approval of medical care for official duties for the instant accident, other than the pre-approval injury and injury to the U.S. during the period of applying for approval of medical care for official duties (such injury and injury were not approved on the ground that there was no causal link with official duties). However, the instant injury and injury did not apply for approval of medical care for official duties. 2) The Plaintiff’s back of the instant accident and the Plaintiff’s vehicle are shocked behind the Plaintiff’s vehicle.