Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry described above Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 5, 6-1 and 6-2:
The Defendant is a company that provides a credit card merchant with the “credit inquiry service” and the “credit card transaction information at a credit card merchant” and “credit card company” (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “VN service”) that provides a credit card merchant with automatic transfer of credit sales proceeds by transmitting the data, such as the credit card number, from the customer via the credit card inquiry terminal, and delivers the results of the approval to the credit card company, and then provides the credit card merchant with the credit card transaction information at the credit card merchant via the device, and at the same time, transmits the credit card merchant to the credit card merchant and automatically transfers the card price to the account of the credit card merchant (hereinafter referred to as the “credit card merchant service”).
B. On August 1, 2014, the Defendant entered into a business support agreement for VN agency business (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Plaintiff (the trade name was “B”) and the Plaintiff, a service agent, with a view to collecting and managing a credit card merchant that received VN service on behalf of the Defendant, and providing VN service to the Plaintiff, a service agent, and the Plaintiff entered into a contract for VN agency business support (hereinafter “instant agreement”).
The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.
Article 1 (Contract Terms and Conditions of the Plaintiff), Terms and Conditions, Number of Contracts, and Other Plaintiff C 36 Months C 10,800,000 case (No. 300,000 case per month)
1. The Plaintiff shall agree to the Defendant on the actual use of the converted franchise store’s credit card.
2. The Plaintiff’s credit card usage results generated at the chain store is at least the amount set forth in paragraph 1 above.