1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the second and second bottom of the judgment of the first instance, “A case is pending in the trial,” the appeal of the first instance court to “A case was lodged by C against the objection, but the appeal was dismissed (In Mancheon District Court 2017No2415), and is currently pending in the final appeal (Supreme Court 2018Do6835).”

At the bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 8th class "no dispute exists" has been adjudicated as "no dispute or substantial fact in this court".

The following shall be added from 3 pages of the judgment of the first instance to 5:

[In addition to the finding of the above facts by the first instance court, the appellate court (Seoul District Court 2017No2415) also requested that a woman involved in the commercial sex acts act arrange and arrange the commercial sex acts at a number of conference rooms located within the Fel-dong Fel-dong-dong-dong-Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and C also refused the above woman's request for the commercial sex acts at the first time of the instant case, but it is recognized that the contact with the above woman to arrange the commercial sex acts was not an illegal

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.