1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,640,895 to the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from May 11, 2015 to May 10, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s New Town 1 and 4 District Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor”)

The Housing Redevelopment Cooperative is established to promote housing development projects in the center of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul. The Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Council is the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Council of Residents’ Representatives (hereinafter “Defendant’s Council of Residents’ Council”).

61) The apartment of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) located in the 61st century.

(2) The Plaintiff is a company that is engaged in dispatching and guarding human resources, and the Defendant is a company that is engaged in multi-family housing and building facility management business.

B. On December 24, 2013, the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Union and the Defendant’s above consignment contract with the Defendant to manage the instant apartment complex and its ancillary facilities, etc. entrusted to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant consignment contract”).

(2) According to Article 2(3) of the entrustment contract of this case, the Defendant may re-consign part of the management obligation to a specialized service company with the consent of the council of occupants’ representatives and the association of the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

C. On January 29, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for cleaning and security services with the Defendant for cleaning services (hereinafter “instant cleaning services contract”) with respect to the instant apartment complex (hereinafter “instant cleaning services contract”).

)A security service contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant security service contract”)

(2) Each of the above contracts was concluded (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant services contracts”).

B. The term of each of the instant service contracts was extended from February 3, 2014 to February 2, 2015, while each of the said service contracts was extended until April 2015.

The main contents of each service contract of this case are as follows.