Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On April 13, 2012, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months as a crime of fraud in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 3, 2012.

[2] Defendant B, as the de facto representative of E located in Sinsi-si (State) in Sinsi-si, was attached to the head of Sinsi-si, the head of Sinsi-si, the head of Sinsi-si, the head of Sinsi-si, the head of Sinsi-si, the head of Sinsi-si

Defendant

A is a person who has served as the head of (State) E.

The Defendants conspired to acquire money as a deposit by deceiving the victim F, who is a cafeteria of the elementary school of Defendant A, as if he had the right to operate a restaurant, in a situation where the operation of the company is difficult.

Accordingly, on April 23, 2010, the Defendants paid KRW 50 million with the te deposit to grant the right to operate the restaurant in the intra-company place where the soil and stones were collected from the Jung-Eup-si Office. D. 3 months or less.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, GH is set up in the form and quality of the above Jung-Eup, and it is not possible to permit the collection of earth and stones as a forest conservation zone, so there was no capacity or intent to provide the restaurant operation right normally even if the damaged party received deposits from the injured party.

The Defendants, by deceiving the victim as such, received the remittance of KRW 50 million from the victim to the one who was in the name of the head of the Tong in the form of E (State) in the form of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness B, F, and J (only defendant A);

1. Part of each prosecutor’s protocol (including the F’s statement) concerning the Defendants to examine the suspect

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A copy of the name of Defendant A;

1. (In-house Copy of Contract for Entrustment of cafeterias);

1. A copy of the agreement;

1. A copy of the deposit certificate of passbook;

1. A copy of a deposit certificate;

1. Investigation report (the statement of an excursion ship by a public official of a regular Eup/Myeon/Dong);

1. Criminal conciliation protocol;

1. Recording notes 1.