The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) did not constitute assaulting the victims jointly as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

2. The court below acknowledged the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below: ① the victims' sexual intercourse from the investigative agency to the court of the court below; ② the victims' sexual intercourse with the J office was sent to the victim's sexual intercourses around 22:15 on June 17, 2015. On the same day, the victims' sexual intercourse was sent to the J office and the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the victim F, and the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the police office around 22:27 on the same day; the victim's sexual intercourse was reported to the police office around 22:27 on the same day; the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the victim's sexual intercourse, and the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the victim's sexual intercourse, and the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the victim's sexual intercourse and the victim's sexual intercourse was sent to the police office. However, the victim's sexual intercourse did not appear to have been sent to the defendant.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion of factual mistake is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.