logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 12. 21. 선고 2017두66237 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 주식의 명의신탁에 있어서 조세회피목적이 없었다고 단정하기 어렵고 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-6304 ( December 21, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2015west 3438 ( October 08, 2015)

Title

(In the title trust of the instant shares, it is difficult to readily conclude that there was no tax avoidance purpose, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

Summary

(C) Article 52 of the Corporate Tax Act provides that “The title trust of the instant shares shall be subject to the application of the corporate tax rate higher than the transfer tax rate by title trust,” and Article 52 of the Corporate Tax Act provides that the title trust of the instant shares shall be subject to the application of the provision on wrongful calculation.” Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that there was an intention to avoid such corporate tax burden

Related statutes

Article 45-2 (Legal Fiction of Donation of Title Trust Property)

Article 69 (Tax Base Return of Gift Tax)

Cases

2017Du66237 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○○○ 20

Defendant-Appellee

○○ Head of Tax Office and 13

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu63004 Decided September 21, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices

arrow