A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On January 2, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Seoul Central District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on July 11, 2007, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sungnam Branch of the Suwon District Court, which was issued to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and has violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

1. Violation of the Act on the Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the violation of the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) was under the influence of around 23:10 on October 22, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.080% of blood alcohol concentration, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.080% on the two-lanes of the roads in front of the luminous life distance in front of the new Sinpoon Sinpo-Eup in Gwangju.

At the time, it is an intersection where a signal is installed at night and at that time, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the motor vehicle safely by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle by reducing the speed and properly putting the other motor vehicles' attitudes in the front and rear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in proceeding as it was, and the Defendant was faced with a part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the passenger car, following the D-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo-W

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as catitis, which requires treatment for about two weeks by negligence in the course of business as above.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the Karen car without mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report (1) and a traffic accident occurrence report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver and a circumstantial report on the host driver;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Photographs;

1. His previous convictions.