logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2010.06.17 2009가합142028
소유권이전등기 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant Daelim Industry Co., Ltd. shall be dismissed in entirety.

2. The Defendant J-Regional Housing Association shall:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are entitled to the status of the parties to the defendant J District Housing Association (hereinafter “Defendant J District Housing Association”) under each of the following subparagraphs:

The buyers of each unit sale contract (hereinafter “each unit sale contract of this case”) entered in the separate registration procedure performance list in the separate sheet with respect to each unit of real estate (hereinafter “each unit sale contract of this case”) listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 9 (hereinafter “K”) after selling each unit of land and building as stated in the separate sheet and providing each unit of land and building as a project site, and the defendant association entered into a contract for each unit sale contract of this case (hereinafter “each unit sale contract of this case”) with the defendant association and the defendant association as an agent for the execution of the defendant association (hereinafter “K”), and the defendant association entered into a contract for each unit sale contract of this case with the defendant association and the defendant company's association members of the housing association (hereinafter “the plaintiffs' association of this case”) as the purchase price of the apartment house of this case, which is an apartment house of this case (hereinafter “the unit sale contract of this case”) with the defendant association and the defendant company of this case.

B. Around June 2003, the representative director of K, who promised to provide the business site of the plaintiffs and to grant the qualification of members of K, promised to purchase the land and buildings owned by the plaintiffs, and to purchase the land and buildings owned by the plaintiffs to be incorporated into the business site of the instant project, and to grant the plaintiffs the qualification of members of the defendant association to purchase the newly constructed apartment bonds (32 square meters). The plaintiffs sold each land and building as listed below and received the payment from K for the purchase price.

On June 2003, the sale price of the subject matter of the contract of the seller A (N) is the sale price.

arrow