1. The Defendant’s KRW 84,791,057 and KRW 84,779,04 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 12% per annum from October 30, 2014 to February 24, 2015.

I. Description of the claim

1. The Plaintiff’s legal status of the Plaintiff Fund (hereinafter “Plaintiff Fund”) is a non-profit special corporation established under the Credit Guarantee Fund Act, which contributes to the development of the national economy, by guaranteeing the obligation owed by an enterprise which lacks security power to a financial institution and facilitating its financing.

2. The Plaintiff Fund has guaranteed the Defendant Company’s obligation to pay the principal and interest of loan when it receives a loan equivalent to the same amount from an enterprise bank in accordance with the following guarantee form by issuing a credit guarantee form upon the request of Defendant Sejong Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”). The Defendant Company received a loan as follows.

(1) A company bank on May 4, 2018;

3. Credit guarantee contracts;

A. The above credit guarantee provided by the Plaintiff Fund was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant pursuant to the following credit guarantee agreements.

In other words, when the Plaintiff Fund receives a claim for the discharge of the guaranteed obligation from the obligee due to the default (including loss of profit of the due date) of the principal obligation (including the repayment period of installment) due to the principal obligation (including the repayment period of installment) of the Defendant Company, it agreed to pay the guarantee fee, administrative fine, penalty, penalty, damages, substitute payment, etc. arising from the credit guarantee agreement and the credit guarantee agreement that the amount of the guaranteed obligation and damages for delay from the due date to the due date.

B. Nonparty A, a joint and several surety, was the same as a separate and several surety, and at the present Daejeon District Court 2014Hadan2380 and 2014, the respective bankruptcy and exemption procedures were excluded from the principal suit.

4. The defendant company bears the guaranteed obligation of this case.