beta
Text
1. As to KRW 226,974,427 and KRW 225,449,763 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall annually year from July 10, 2014 to October 16, 2014.
Reasons
I. Description of the claim
1. The Plaintiff’s legal status of the Plaintiff’s Fund is a non-profit special corporation established under the Credit Guarantee Fund Act, which contributes to the development of the national economy by guaranteeing the obligation owed by an enterprise which lacks security power to a financial institution and facilitating its financing.
2. A credit guarantee and loan content are as follows, at the request of the Defendant, the representative of the B-owned station, and the Defendant guaranteed the obligation to repay the principal and interest to be borne by the Defendant for B2B purchase loan from the new bank. Accordingly, the Defendant received a loan equivalent to the same amount from the new bank.
D. C 285,00,000 B2B on February 26, 2010, 2010
3. The Plaintiff’s credit guarantee contract concluded with the Plaintiff and the Defendant, namely, the following credit guarantee agreement: (a) where the Plaintiff received a claim from the obligee for the discharge of the guaranteed obligation due to a default (including loss of benefit of time) of the principal obligation (including the repayment of installment) due to the Defendant’s principal obligation due (including the repayment of installment repayment) due (including the repayment of installment repayment), the Plaintiff agreed to pay the amount of the guaranteed obligation and the amount of damages determined by the Plaintiff from the date of performance to the date of full payment; and (b) the guarantee fee, administrative fine, penalty, penalty, damages, substitute payment, etc. arising under the credit
4. The Defendant, upon receiving a claim for the performance of the guaranteed obligation of a new bank, caused the occurrence of a guarantee accident caused by the substantial closure of business (not less than three months of business suspension and closure) on March 7, 2014, when the period of extension of the guarantee period, which was due to the Defendant’s failure to repay the loan after the execution of the said loan, and the Plaintiff fulfilled the guaranteed obligation of KRW 225,449,763 as to the instant guarantee case upon the request for the performance of the guaranteed obligation of the new bank.
5. The plaintiff is golded to preserve the execution of the proposed guarantee of this case.