logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.05.11 2018고단246
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on May 28, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Port Correctional Institution on September 19, 2015; on August 31, 2016, he/she was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Jungan District Court on August 31, 2016; and on March 23, 2017, he/she was sentenced to one year of termination of the execution of the sentence at the Seoan District Court on March 23, 2017; and was engaged in fraud.

【Criminal facts】 Around September 18, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “I will send me to the Defendant, who remitted KRW 250,000 upon transfer of KRW 250,000,” on the victim D who reported and contacted the statement to the effect that “I will send me with the transfer of KRW 250,000.”

However, even if the defendant does not have money or receives money from the injured party under the name of the purchase price, he shall send money to the injured party.

there was no intention or ability to act.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received (Account Number: E) 250,000 won from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant from the victim, from January 18, 2018, and acquired it by transfer equivalent to KRW 62,965,00 in total from the victims over 36 times, such as the List of Crimes (1) in attached Form 36 times, from January 18, 2018.

[2018 Highest 692] The Defendant called the victim H in light of G around September 25, 2017, which is located in the Mayang-si F, and sold any clothing in addition to the clothes allocated to the direct store at the black Y or the headquarters of the Rasberber, or sold it on the Internet by receiving a clothing from other store employees in the inside and selling it on the Internet.

B. A false statement was made to the effect that the purchase price of the clothes would be paid in the same way.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to keep profits from the sale of the above method, and purchased the clothing from the injured party.

arrow