Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2016, at around 23:48, the Defendant demanded that the victim D (the 44 years of age) under the influence of alcohol set the convenience store for the victim, hearing the dispute over the problem between the upper floor and the floor noise, and the victim brought a dispute to the Defendant by “I am a main figure, why I am a bad?” while the victim scams to the Defendant by “I am a main figure, why I am a bad?” the victim scamed, 2-3 tight towards the Defendant on the wall, scam the Defendant by hand, scam the Defendant’s scam, and scam, scambling, and scam, etc., and the Defendant scambling the Defendant’s chest by hand against the above act.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim on the left-hand chest part of the treatment period requiring about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Police investigation report (to be accompanied by convenience points ctv closure data submitted by a suspect A);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The Defendant of photograph, convenience point CCTV video CD merely carried the victim's right chest, and there was no injury on the victim's left chest, such as the injury diagnosis statement. However, according to the video CD recorded on the surface at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was acknowledged to have known that the Defendant left outside of the convenience store and dispute with the victim several times, and the Defendant had been issued the injury diagnosis with approximately two weeks of medical treatment at the Gangseo-dong Hospital on the following day of the instant case, with the victim's "multi-feassing typry," and the victim was issued with approximately two weeks of medical treatment at the Gangseo-dong Hospital. The diagnosis of the above injury and the preparation of the injury diagnosis report were conducted at a time close to the instant case, and there was no special circumstance to doubt the credibility in the process of the issuance of the counter diagnosis statement, and the victim's injury load and degree stated in the above injury diagnosis report coincide with the circumstances or extent of the injury alleged by the victim.