1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant, from 2004 to 2005, entrusted a third party with the management process of part of the business affairs of the 14 sectors, such as protection and railroad maintenance, for the purpose of improving human resources structure, as a way to maximize the management effect and efficiency.

B. Of them, the Defendant is a specialized security service company established on March 7, 2005 and entered into a security service contract with the Defendant. The Defendant is a specialized security service company.

The Plaintiff, while serving as the employee of the Defendant Company, was retired from the Defendant Company in accordance with the aforementioned Acsing policy, and was employed on May 1, 2005 and worked on May 1, 2005.

B. Around 2004, the Defendant anticipated difficulties in lowering the international competitiveness, which led to concentration of company functions and human resources in core areas, and the remaining areas of the company’s implementation of the policies for outsourcing as a specialized specialized company.

Accordingly, the defendant, at the first stage in 2005, has 5 fields (protection, railroad maintenance, tin boards, labor welfare/education, open space facilities), and 9 fields (i.e., rollls, water treatment, etc.) in 2006. However, at the second stage, the defendant decided to entrust 11 new companies and 8 existing foreign cooperative companies with each business.

C. On November 18, 2004, the Defendant prepared “the direction and promotion plan to improve human resources for securing future competitiveness” and among them, according to the “Ⅳ. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D. D., the Defendant paid the incentive at the time of change of occupation, thereby preserving the total amount of the difference in the labor cost of the former company and the Defendant company, and the labor cost of the former company is 70% premised on

“ Q&A related to the promotion of Agling.”

8. On the basis of the premise that the level of personnel expenses for foreign partnership was 70%, the average level of 70% was compared with the company's wage level of 45 foreign partnership companies in 03 years, compared to the company as the same continuous basis.

To assist the interests of the employees.