logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.29 2016고단6283
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative of a similar recipient company’s “J”, “K”, or L.

1. The above “J” was a company that did not have been engaged in the distribution business because it was not established. The Defendant introduced himself/herself to the representative of the said “K and L or to the Daegu branch office. However, the representative of the said “K and L” was not the head of the said Daegu branch office. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the profit therefrom to investors by running the distribution business or travel business through each of the above companies.

Nevertheless, from June 18, 2015 to August 2, 2016, the Defendant concluded that “J” against many unspecified victims (including functional health foods, cosmetics, etc. at a price higher than the supply unit price for some victims) at the Daegu-dong M building J office in the same city and the five-story N office in the same city and Jung-gu N agency in the same city is a distribution company, and “K and L” are companies engaging in travel business and distribution business, and if they are subscribed to the sales class (SC class in the case of J), they will be promoted to the class of team leader within three to six months, and if the head of the group is the head of the group, they will pay KRW 50 to 6 million in one month, and return the principal to the two months.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victims, obtained a total of KRW 612,496,00 from the victims, such as the statement in the list of crimes in attached Form 105.

2. In spite of the fact that no person violating the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts commits any act of receiving money, etc. from many and unspecified persons for the purpose of receiving money, etc. under the pretext of investment, etc., each of the above companies did not obtain authorization or permission from the authorities concerned.

Defendant 1 stated in the above paragraph 1;

arrow