logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2020.12.11 2019고단477
절도미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 477"

1. From December 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 18:50 on a 18:50-round 25, 2018, the victim C was placed on the entrance side of the restaurant at the D cafeteria operated by the victim C, and the victim’s share 50,000-g of rice (20 km) was discovered to the victim’s children and customers.

In this regard, the Defendant attempted to steal a rice gun as above and attempted to do so.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위 1항 기재 일시 및 장소에서 위 1항 기재와 같은 이유로 신고를 받고 출동한 목포경찰서 E파출소 소속 경사 F가 피고인을 ‘절도미수‘ 혐의로 현행범 인수하여 순찰차 뒷좌석에 태우려고 하자, 왼손 주먹으로 위 F의 오른쪽 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 발로 다리 부분을 3-4회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above F and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning F’s dispatch of report and acquisition of flagrant offenders.

"2019 Highest 890"

1. Night-time theft of buildings;

A. On July 5, 2019, around 23:54, the Defendant: (a) invaded the inside through a cafeteria operated by the victim C, which had not been corrected, and then stolen the inside through a cafeteria operated by the victim C; and (b) had a 40,000 won large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale

B. On July 6, 2019, around 01:58, the Defendant intruded into the inside through a window that was not corrected at the place described in paragraph 1(a) and then stolen the same victim’s market price of KRW 40,000.

2. On June 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 01:22, at the place specified in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) at the same victim’s market price at which the Defendant had the same victim’s possession; (c) one fluorized powder with defluoring with defluoring with the market price; and (d) on the same day at the same place, at around 01:45 on the same day, the Defendant continued to have one fluoring tree with the market price owned by the same victim at the entrance.

In this respect.

arrow