1. Defendant B

(a) a notarial deed with executory power of No. 546, 2015, issued by a notary public;

1. Basic facts

A. The second floor, third floor, and third floor (hereinafter “F building”) located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “F building”) between the Plaintiff and D and E

As to the Plaintiff and D, deposit KRW 70 million between the Plaintiff and D, KRW 4.4 million per month of rent (including value-added tax), and the lease agreement was concluded on April 15, 2014 from May 21, 2014 to May 20, 2017. (2) Of the first floor of the building located in Daegu-gu, the lease agreement was made between the Plaintiff and E with respect to KRW 50 million on the right side (hereinafter “G building”), KRW 3.63 million per month of rent (including value-added tax), and the period from July 8, 2014 to July 7, 2016.

B. The lease contract between B and D is prepared on April 15, 2014 with the same content as that of B and D as that of B and D with respect to F buildings.

2) As to G buildings, the same content as that of the above No. 1. A. 2 as that of B and E was written on July 9, 2014.

C. The Defendant: (i) based on the executory exemplification of the notarial deed No. 546, 2015, 2015, based on B’s executory exemplification of the Cjoint Law Office Deed No. 546, the Defendant filed an application for the seizure and collection order as to B’s claim for the refund of the lease deposit against B and F building No. 1369; and (ii) on October 12, 2015, the said order was served on D and H on October 14, 2015; and (ii) based on the executory copy of the notarial deed No. 587, the Defendant filed an application for the seizure and collection order as to B’s claim for the refund of the lease deposit against B’s G building No. 2015, based on the executory copy of the notarial deed No. 2015, 2015; and (iii) issued the seizure and collection order as to the claim No. 1215, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1, 3.