Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in K5 taxi driving services.

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 09:52, and stopped two lanes in front of the 95 mountain area of the mountain area in the direction of the mountain, the mountain, and the mountain, the mountain, the mountain, and the mountain, the mountain, the mountain, and the mountain.

A person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle without breaking the center line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the front part of the victim C's driving DCA 110B Orala, which was proceeding along one lane of the same line while the Defendant got into the center line, as it was, a part on the left side of the above taxi by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as cutting down the upper part of the upper part of the body, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident and reporting thereon;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act and the Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the degree of injury of the victim due to the instant accident is not less severe, and the negligence of the defendant who snicked with the central line is also less severe, but the defendant has agreed with the victim that the defendant reflects his fault in depth, that the vehicle is insured by the taxi mutual aid association, and all other sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of the instant case, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, criminal record (the same criminal record as the first fine), accident circumstance, and circumstances after the commission of the crime.