Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who has a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on October 19, 192. A.
On Oct. 1, 2008, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B one time from the mutual incompetence in the synthetic Dong, Masan-si, Masan-si.
B. On Nov. 1, 2008, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B on one occasion at the mutually incompetence in Busan East-gu, Busan.
C. On December 8, 2008, the Defendant served as the head of the building B located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, from 405 to B and once.
On December 15, 2008, the Defendant had sexual intercourse B and once with B at the above house.
In this respect, the defendant was sent to B and each other over four times.
2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse, and even at each time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A four times as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants (including the C's substitute statement)
1. Statement made to C by the police statement;
1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the petition for complaint, each photograph, certificate of receipt of divorce, copy of marriage certificate, and family relation certificate;
1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendants) Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that the suspension of execution (the defendants) is not less than Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the circumstances such as the fact that there is no other previous convictions and the fact that the mistakes are repented);