Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

E is a person who is the representative director of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”) on the 6th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul F building, and Defendant A is a person who has worked as G employee from February 201 to February 201, and Defendant B is a spouse of Defendant A.

E around May 2014, Australia Company, which was handled by G, decided to develop and operate “K”, a product similar to the “J” of the improved product of “I” (the patient dancing-type Corm) with patent rights, and at the time, G had a consulting agreement entered into with H remains for three years, and at the time, G had a patent registered with “K” in the name of an employee belonging to G or G, or sold a product at the time of concerns over the legal dispute with H. In the event that the legal dispute arises with “K”, the business owner would be the Defendant B, and the Defendant A, who was qualified as a quality manager, was treated as having retired from G on the last day of August 2014, to obtain medical device permission from the Food and Drug Administration, was treated as having been formally retired from G, and had the newly established L work as quality manager.

1. Defendant A