logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.04.03 2012고단7198
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 7198"

1. Since June 15, 2009, money and valuables provider E, along with F, registered the business entity called “H” with the name of “H” as its representative from the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, and issued a tax invoice at the time of selling the Gu interest, and filed a sales report. However, since there is no intention to pay taxes from the beginning and there is no need to receive the purchase deduction, the purchase report was evaded by 3.75 billion won for the second half of the year 2009 in a way that the purchase report was not almost possible, for the second half of 2009.

On October 15, 2009, E withdrawn H’s 1.16 million won in front of the New Bank of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 469-5, Gao-dong, from I, J, K, etc., and was subject to a multiple-time investigation under the suspicion of a stimulation at the Seoul Eunpyeong Police Station. In the process, in the future, it is apprehended that he would be subject to criminal punishment for a case of evading the tax of KRW 100 million in the future, E would be subject to criminal punishment for a case of evading the tax of KRW 100 million in the future, after getting off to Busan around October 2009 and having been known to Busan for a long time.

Defendant A introduced to E, “In China, the professor of L University among the students in the Republic of Korea, and his first finite is a lawyer, who is the chief prosecutor of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office, who is the head prosecutor of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office, and that he will use his finite in advance upon request from the person who is the chief prosecutor of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office, and will use his finite.”

On November 2, 2009, at the Oil restaurant located in the Seo-gu Busan, Busan, Defendant A talked about the circumstances of Defendant A and changed to the extent that it does not constitute a case, and M stated that “B may be said that there is no case where the second v. in the city is the chief prosecutor of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office, the larger v. is the attorney before the Public Prosecutor’s Office, and there is any prosecutor in the inner Gu and there is any cost to the Prosecutor’s Office.”

Thus, E is located in the P of Suwon-gu Busan around November 3, 2009.

arrow