Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap40674 ( March 31, 2013)
Title
The plaintiffs cannot be deemed to have transferred the shares of this case at a price significantly higher than the market price without justifiable grounds.
Summary
It is reasonable to view that the transfer of shares in this case is done in return for the transfer of the position of a KOSDAQ-listed corporation, and it constitutes a case where there is a justifiable reason to make a transaction at a price higher than the market price in the open market.
Related statutes
Article 35(2) of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act
Cases
2013Nu18614 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax
Plaintiff, Appellant
1. ParkA 2. GaB
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The director of the tax office.
Judgment of the first instance court
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap40674 decided May 31, 2013
Conclusion of Pleadings
January 10, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
January 24, 2014
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.
Cheong-gu Office
The Defendant’s imposition of gift tax OOO on December 1, 201 against Plaintiff Parkba and Plaintiff ParkB on the gift tax imposed on Plaintiff Parkba shall be revoked.
subsection (1)
The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
Reasons
The reasoning of this decision is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the correction to "the fact that the calculation of the stock value of CC accounting corporation was made arbitrarily without any reasonable ground," which seems to have been likely to have been accompanied by Section 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in Section 8, and the statement in Section 2 through 8 alone is not sufficient to recognize that the calculation of the stock value of CC accounting corporation was made arbitrarily without any reasonable ground." If so, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted for reasons, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is, and therefore, the