logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.02.10 2015가단14223
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part of the litigation in this case which claims recording expenses, expenses for certified judicial scrivener, and fees for vehicle appraisal shall be dismissed;

2. The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The automobiles listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant automobiles”) were owned by Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) for the purpose of selling after acquiring them around November 6, 2013.

B. On February 5, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased the instant motor vehicle by designating the sales price as KRW 33,00,000 as the broker of Defendant D, a used motor vehicle with which Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) was sead, and completed the ownership transfer registration on February 6, 2014.

C. After being delivered to the Plaintiff in Daejeon U.S., the Plaintiff stopped the Plaintiff’s automobile with an excessive noise from the engine side at 30 minutes, since it was impossible to operate the instant automobile upon entering an expressway for returning home.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

The stop of the instant vehicle while driving the engine is the direct cause of the engine’s 5 metric tons and KONing damage located from the off pumps among the five metric tons inside the engine. This is presumed to have been damaged by the relevant scke tons and KONing with the engine’s total contamination and circulation failure, etc., as the engine’s daily supply was obstructed to 5 metric tons due to the engine’s serious pollution and circulation failure due to the car and slots, etc.

E. The serious pollution and circulation failure of the engine error did not undergo a basic inspection of the main and the exhauster and the doer, which continued in excess of the engine error exchange cycle.

Defendant C’s representative director E tried to supplement the engine error due to the lack of engine error warning, etc. one time before the instant automobile was sold to the Plaintiff, but did not supplement the engine error.

F. E and Defendant D shall be the Daejeon District Court with respect to the instant accident.

arrow