logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고단3087
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative director of E, a used vehicle sales company located in Daejeon P or 331, and on November 6, 2013, a person who acquired and owned FHUMMHEH 3 used vehicle in the name of E, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant used vehicle”) for sale.

In addition, Defendant A is a used car dealer belonging to G Co., Ltd.

On February 5, 2014, the victim H purchased the vehicle of this case from Defendant B through the mediation of Defendant A on November 7, 2013, and received from Defendant A a record of the inspection of the performance status of used cars issued on November 7, 2013 (the inspector corporation, U.S. C., U.S. C.).

In this regard, the second class of the instant vehicle was suspended at the engine level on the engine side in order for the victim H to return home upon delivery of the said vehicle on the same day, and at 30 minutes, the second class of the instant vehicle was suspended at the engine side.

The suspension of the instant vehicle was due to the significant pollution and circulation defect of the engine date, and the engine’s inside 5 metric tons and the KONing RON caused damage to the engine. This is because the pollution and circulation defect of the engine date continued in the state of exceeding the engine’s error exchange cycle.

Where a motor vehicle dealer sells or assists in the sale of a motor vehicle, he/she shall notify in writing a buyer of the details of a performance inspection of the structure, devices, etc. of the relevant motor vehicle as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and shall not inspect or notify the relevant performance and condition in

Defendant

B did not examine whether or not the engine was exchanged rapidly, even if there was an error in the engine of the secondhand vehicle in the instant case, and it was only known to Defendant A that it would be exchanged when it re-enters the engine in the future.

Defendant

A is the same as above from Defendant B.

arrow