logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.29 2017고단4018
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On December 27, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint coercion) at the Seoul Western District Court on September 19, 2007, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 19, 2007. On July 14, 2017, the Seoul Northern District Court was sentenced to 1 year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for anless teacher and became final and conclusive on December 28, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim C around March 2008 sent the victim C with a relationship with the victim C.

On April 18, 2008, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim in Eelel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to lend money to the victim for business activities related to France.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have any particular property and did not run the French related business, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to complete the payment.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5 million from the victim as the borrowed money on the same day, and received KRW 91,89,000 from August 31, 2008 through KRW 44 times from that time to August 31, 2008 as indicated in the List of Crimes.

2. From December 2009, the Defendant lodging the victim F in Yangyang-gun G, Gangwon-do, in the Helel operated by the victim F.

On December 24, 2009, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim at the above Hel on December 24, 2009, because “The Defendant was unable to withdraw money after the magics of the credit card with which he has paid are damaged, and the amount of KRW 100 million is exceeded in the passbook.”

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have a KRW 100 million, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received money from the victim, which is 40,000 won on the same day, and 2.6 million won on the 28.2 million won on the 28.2 of the same month, from the victim as the borrowed money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Second installment;

arrow