The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment) by the lower court (e., six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with victims, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to be excessively heavy beyond the reasonable discretion, and thus, the Defendant did not accept the Defendant’s allegation of unfair sentencing, on the grounds that the sentencing of the Defendant does not exceed the reasonable discretion, even though the Defendant was placed in the place of the suspended sentence due to special larceny in 2013, and was sentenced to a punishment again during the suspended sentence period, and that there was no new special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be reflected in the sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.