The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and imprisonment with labor for two years and six months) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime again in a short period after the completion of the execution of punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime again in a short period, including several criminal offenses committed by the same kind of crime, and the Defendant did not agree with some victims. There are no new special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be reflected in the sentencing after the decision of the lower court was rendered, and other various circumstances, which are the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, relationship to victims, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentencing does not seem to be too heavy beyond the scope of reasonable discretion, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.