beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[Criminal Power] On May 29, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the same crime at Daejeon District Court on December 1, 201, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for habitual larceny, etc. at the same court on June 25, 2015.
On the other hand, on April 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) in the same court, and completed the execution of the said sentence in the first prison of North Korea North Korea on April 20, 2019
[2019 Highest 3934]
1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) by the Defendant: From September 4, 2019 to the same year;
9. 5. At around 01:31, the victim C’s Dialel E, which is located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, stolen the victim’s property by taking out one copy of the Cal Kakao Pab card, which was contained in the F-owned test external management.
Accordingly, the defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment not less than three times due to larceny, has stolen another's property.
2. Fraud and violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;
A. On September 5, 2019, around 01:31, the Defendant: (a) purchased one of the arms sn beam lines equivalent to KRW 3,250 in the market value; (b) purchased one of the arms sn beam lines equivalent to KRW 3,250 in order to pay the price normally to the employees of the convenience store; and (c) received the stolen Ka Kafs, as indicated in the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, by presenting one kylfscam card; and (d) unlawfully used the stolen gafscam card.
B. On September 5, 2019, around 01:33, at the same place as the above paragraph (a), the Defendant purchased one scambling 1,100 won of the market value and one scaming flaf, which is equivalent to the 6,100 won of the market value, and as the Defendant would normally settle the price to the staff of the convenience store, the Defendant presented a stolen car cam card as indicated in the above paragraph (1) and illegally used the stolen cam card.