logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.29 2017고단2263
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 2017, the Defendant: (a) was the bad credit holder at the time when the Defendant was employed by the Defendant to work for the Defendant Company B; and (b) was willing to purchase mobile phones and automobiles in the name of the victim even though the Defendant was unable to pay the loan by installments in the name of the victim even if the Defendant was to purchase mobile phones and automobiles with the loan made in the name of the victim, even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the loan, the Defendant was able to purchase the mobile phone and automobiles in the name of the victim.

1. On January 13, 2017, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would, within three months from the date on which he/she opened a mobile phone in the name of the city, use the mobile phone in the name of the city, make full payment of the user fee and the cost of the mobile phone terminal within the name of the city and move the mobile phone in the name of the city.”

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim purchase 836,00 won in its name by means of galloning S7 mobile phones equivalent to the market price of 836,000 won, and had the victim acquire financial profits equivalent to the above amount.

2. On January 14, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the said victim to the same effect as Paragraph 1, in purchasing Y 3 in a place like No. 1 at a gallon, had the victim acquire a debt equivalent to the above amount by having the victim purchase S3 fish in his/her name at a gallon gallon equivalent to the market price of 459,800 won, and thereby having the victim acquire a pecuniary profit equivalent to the above amount.

3. On January 14, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the said victim that “I 30 vehicles will be loaned to the Plaintiff under the name of four, and then I am to pay in full the installment of the vehicle within three months at the face of the week and move in the name of the vehicle under the name of the Plaintiff.”

However, the defendant's property status is identical to the above, and even if a car is purchased with a loan under the victim's name, the loan is extended.

arrow