A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was sentenced to six years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on September 6, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 14, 2016, and currently is serving in the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju Women’s Prison.

2. The Defendant, from around 2006, operated the automobile trading company of the trade name of “E” in the D Motor Vehicle Trading Complex located in Incheon Nam-gu, and operated the automobile trading company of “G” in the F Motor Vehicle Trading Complex located in Incheon Nam-gu from around 2007.

As seen above, the Defendant used the vehicle dealer’s loan to operate the vehicle dealer’s loan to terminate the shortage of operating funds. Ultimately, it is impossible for the Defendant to operate the vehicle dealer’s business normally due to the accumulated business operator, and it is impossible for the Defendant to repay the Defendant’s existing debt. The fact is that the Defendant borrowed money or borrowed money from a financial institution under the name of the Plaintiff, but the Defendant did not have the ability to repay the loan even if it was not possible to repay the loan. However, if the Defendant borrowed money to the victims, the Defendant borrowed money by means of fraud as if it would change the loan, or, if he borrowed money from the name of the lender, paid the loan in the name of the victims, and received the loan from the financial institution in the name of the victims as

On July 2008, the Defendant, at the first place in the commercial office for the sale and purchase of the said “E” vehicle, has to purchase the vehicle to receive a business loan from the victim C, and changed the name of the recipient of the loan. Even if the Defendant purchased the vehicle in the name of the victim with the loan borrowed, it would be difficult to dispose of the vehicle to another person within three months and to solve all the amount of the loan interest.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay the loans under the name of the victim C even if he purchased a passenger car with a loan under the name of the victim C.