Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants, in collusion with E (the same day's conditional suspension of indictment) on October 16, 2016, 'G' at the main point of 'G' located in F in Namnam-si around 01:40 on October 16, 2016, 'the minor' is under drinking'. The defendants, in collusion with E (the same day's suspension of indictment), are drinking on the other table of the above main point in order to identify the personal information of three minor K and L, etc. who were under drinking at the above main point in order to prevent the above police officers from understanding the personal information of K who are being born at the above main point.

“Before blocking the front of the above police officers, the chest part of the Defendant I’s chest part of the above police officer I was pushed down one time by hand, and the Defendant C also participated in this part of the chest part of the above security officer I was pushed down one time by hand, and the Defendant B informed the above Defendants’ acts that he could be punished as a obstruction of the performance of official duties on two occasions by hand, and the chest part of the above slope J J’s chest part was passed at the bed.

E took part in the act of the above Defendants and took part in and removed the arms of the above police officers who were attaching L, which is the line of peace.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with E and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to reporting 112 and criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. The Defendants: Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and Articles 136 (Selection of Penalty) of the said Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act jointly interfere with the legitimate control of police officers against a third party; and such obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as an offense detrimental to the foundation of the rule of law by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority.