The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged shall not make a person slickly in the surroundings by very rough words or conducts, or alcoholic beverages to other persons without good cause, at a place where many people gather or frequent, such as a public hall, theater, restaurant, etc., or on a train, motor vehicle, ship carrying many people;

Nevertheless, on June 10, 2016, the Defendant, at the entrance of a D cafeteria located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, Maddong-si, Maddong-si, Maddong-si, Maddong-si, Maddong

In order to put tobacco to E with a different kind of tobacco, but in order to cause tobacco not to be smoked, there was an act of disturbing drinking by very rough or disorderly words and actions, such as putting his hand and trees, while putting in a bath, such as tobacco delivery Ra and fling.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, although the defendant and E were in dispute, E, while considering the fact that the defendant stated that he did not have any disturbance or disturbance at the entrance of the D cafeteria at this court, the above evidence alone, i.e., drinking disturbance, etc. as prescribed by Article 3(1)20 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, i.e., very rough or disorderly words or conducts, and thus, he was under the influence of alcohol.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is not publicly announced pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.