beta
Text
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 29,000,000 as well as to the plaintiff from December 20, 2018 to April 18, 2019.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The plaintiff and the defendant are relatives.
B. The Defendant agreed to deliver 5% of the amount invested by the Plaintiff as monthly income (hereinafter “instant investment agreement”) by recommending the Plaintiff to purchase virtual currency Bitcoin in Japan and make an investment in the Republic of Korea to sell them and make profits therefrom, and accordingly, remitted KRW 30,000 to the Defendant on March 9, 2018.
C. Meanwhile, the Defendant received the above KRW 30,000,000 from the Plaintiff, and on the same day, remitted KRW 12,000,000 to the Defendant’s mother-friendly account; KRW 6,000,000 to another account under the name of the Defendant; KRW 6,000,000 was deposited in cash; and the remainder KRW 6,00,000 was deposited in cash on March 10, 2018.
Defendant: has been well aware of money.
today's income is the white plaintiff: The difference has been different, but the defendant and the defendant are the same as five protons.
B. By no later than the day of the month, Japan had omitted and Japan had no profit until the date of approval for the passport to be protruding out.
The defendant will return the principal if he/she wishes to be omitted: The defendant continues to do so for a few days in Japan, and the plaintiff : the defendant d: the defendant has been living in Korea for a few days, and there is no benefit now.
In this case, it is difficult for the plaintiff to have an interest in Japan because it is bound to do so, because it is not so.
6.2 her fluencing fluencing fluencing by having made an investment.
at the time of the first month, the first month of the payment from the interest sources, and the following: