(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.06.05 2015고단118

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.06.05 2015고단118

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 2, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) on May 2, 2013, in a luminous rupture park located in Dongyoung-si, and (b) on May 2, 2013, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim B even if there was no certain revenue or property at the time and there was no intent or ability to repay the money; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A money is required to process the business closure problem of the Seocho-gu, which has been operated by the Presidential Decree.” (d) the Defendant received KRW 15 million in cash from the victim, namely, at the victim’s seat.

2. On May 2013, the Defendant was found in the victim B’s residence located in the middle of May 2013, 2013, and the Defendant was issued nine million won in cash from the victim, i.e., the victim, despite the fact that the Defendant borrowed money from the victim for the same reason as Paragraph 1, on the ground that “it is necessary to live in the party room, and there is no money. There is no money if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim.”

3. From the end of July 2013, the Defendant committed the crime at the victim B’s residence described in the foregoing Paragraph (2) around the end of July 2013, and the fact was received from the victim, i.e., KRW 6 million in cash, from the victim, despite that the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim on the grounds specified in Paragraph (1) and paragraph (1).

4. Around October 13, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime at no higher than through a Dong-gu (hereinafter referred to as “YA”) around October 13, 2013, and the fact that the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim for the reasons referred to in paragraph (1) even though he did not have the intent or ability to repay the borrowed money, the Defendant would be able to repay the borrowed money to the victim as “the cab day which is likely to pay the borrowed money.”

2,00,000 won due to the occurrence of damage in the taxi company.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고단3309

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.01.08 2013고단896

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.15 2015고단1149

-광주지방법원 2015.09.02 2015고정147

-광주지방법원 2015.12.10 2015고정1532