logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.13 2016가단310813
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 8,253,430 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, respectively, and KRW 200,00 to Plaintiff C, D, and E.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

A is an occupant who resides in the Busan Jin-gu GF (hereinafter “instant apartment”) 101 Dong2105, and the Plaintiff B is the husband, the Plaintiff C, D, and E of the Plaintiff.

Defendant F’s representative council (hereinafter “Defendant F’s representative council”) is the council of occupants’ representatives composed of the occupants of the apartment of this case, and the Defendant SamsungMS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) is the company entrusted with the management of the common areas of the apartment of this case by the Defendant’s representative council.

Plaintiff

A around February 28, 2016, around 20:30 on February 28, 2016, around 20:20:30, along with the Plaintiff B, suffered injuries, such as the removal of food waste by the 1st floor guard room of the instant apartment complex, which was cut back after dumping food waste, and was returned to the house, and the left-hand knee snee snee sne elkes

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). On March 2, 2016, Plaintiff A received scare knee boness from the left-hand knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, and obtained hnee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee ge

Meanwhile, at the time of the instant accident, another day was destroyed that was constructed on the floor near the entrance of the steel drain outlet at the entrance of the place of food waste collection, and the home was generated around the said drainage hole. After the instant accident, the Defendants performed repair work to cover the said home with cement, etc.

[Reasons] The defendant's representative council's liability for damages by the defendant's representative council, which caused no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings, constitutes the possessor of the relevant structure that has preserved and managed the surrounding floor of the drainage hole of the food waste collection site, which is the common use area of the apartment of this case, lack of safety.

arrow