logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.25 2014고정943
상해
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 21, 2013, at the construction site of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) had the victim D (the 56-year-old age) resisted the problem of construction noise; (b) caused the victim’s body that did not turn slowly in front of his/her ready-mixed vehicle; and (c) caused the victim to face with the above ready-mixed vehicle for about 10 days, thereby causing the victim to suffer a complete strawing room in need of treatment for about 10 days.

2. As to the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant consistently denied the fact that the Defendant, at the time and place of the investigation agency to the date and time indicated in the facts charged, had the victim interfered with his/her ready-mixed vehicle, and had the victim interfered with the vehicle.

The evidence submitted by the prosecutor for the purpose of proving the facts charged in the instant case is the victim's investigative agency and the victim's statement in this law and the statement of the injury diagnosis attached to the victim's statement in this law, and the victim's statement of injury

The victim stated in the investigative agency that "the other resident made a port at the construction site as a noise problem, and he was flick without any speech on the front of the defendant's ready-mixed vehicle, but the defendant was faced with the left shoulder and the arms by pushing ahead with the motor vehicle with the left side shoulder and the arms by 3 times. The victim did not go beyond, and he was flicking on the Afoled floor, and he was flicking. The resident was flick, and the police confirmed why he was flick and personal information." In this court, the victim stated that "the defendant was not flick, and the police was flick in the situation of talking with the vehicle."

In addition, the victim first responded to the question "in the event of facing a part of the body in the vehicle" in this law, "the part of the body is essential when facing a part of the vehicle," and the victim was at the time.

arrow