1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Acquisition, etc. of the instant housing project) Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Road Construction”).

2) The instant land is located in the area of 3,018 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) in the area of 3,018 square meters in the area of 556 square meters in the area of the Seocho-gun, Gyeong-gun

(2) As to housing projects (hereinafter “instant housing projects”);

(2) The Plaintiff acquired the instant housing project from the construction on the upper day, with respect to the conversion of the instant site to the Korea Rural Community Corporation as a site, paid KRW 66,094,200 of the farmland preservation charges under Article 38 of the Farmland Act.

On the other hand, the construction on Japan prepared and executed a written waiver of the right to the approval of the housing project plan in this case to the Plaintiff. However, each of the above written statements stated that the construction on Japan transferred to the Plaintiff all rights, including public charges, including the cost of the construction following the approval of the housing project in this case.

B. On May 1, 2014, Sung-gun revoked the approval of the housing project plan plan for the construction of the upper day. On May 1, 2014, Sung-gun sent an official letter to the Plaintiff requesting that the instant land be restored to farmland. Accordingly, on June 9, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the restoration of the instant land and notified this fact to the Sung-gun. 2) on July 18, 2014, Sung-gun sent a letter to refund KRW 66,094,200 of the farmland preservation charges paid from the construction of the upper day to Japan. Accordingly, on July 18, 2014, Sung-gun sent an official letter to the Korea Rural Community Corporation to request the return of the farmland preservation charges.

C. From March 2007, Japan Construction failed to pay the value-added tax and corporate tax due to the instant housing project activities from around March 1, 2007, which led to KRW 1,319,514,010. 2) Accordingly, a resident tax secretary under the Defendant’s jurisdiction shall be a resident tax secretary.