Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was elected as a candidate for the president of a cooperative in an election of the president of a D Forest Association implemented on January 28, 2016, and Defendant B is a person who was elected as a candidate for the president of a cooperative, and Defendant B is a person who was not a candidate for the foregoing election as the president of the former E Forestry Association, and was engaged in an election campaign for Defendant A for whom he was working as the head of

D An election campaign period for the head of a forest association is from January 15, 2016 to January 27, 2016.

Only a candidate may conduct an election campaign from the day following the deadline for registration of a candidate to the day before the election day, and no one shall visit each elector door for an election campaign, and a candidate may conduct an election campaign by personally providing name cards for an election campaign of which the length is 9 cm or smaller than 5 cm in length to the elector or appeal for support at a public place where many persons pass and gather during the election campaign period, and a candidate shall not conduct an election campaign in violation of the method of

1. Defendant A and Defendants B visited G’s house, which is a member of the said forestry cooperative established in Gangwon-do for the election campaign in the order of the end of the election campaign period, on December 2, 2015, prior to the election campaign period, for the election campaign, and Defendant A and the Defendants issued to G one copy of the name name stating the Defendant’s photograph, name, and brief personal history, etc., and simultaneously requested the head of the cooperative as a candidate.

Defendant B refers to the purport that “the forest partnership was old,” and Defendant B refers to “the forest partnership was old.”

B. A is a person who had no duty at the time of the head of the domestic partnership.

At this time, the president of the partnership has become a candidate for the president.

“.........”

As a result, in collusion with the defendant A, if there is no concern about the substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense, the court recognized the facts differently without going through changes in indictment procedures within the same scope.

Even if it does not violate the principle of non-high and unfavorable treatment.