1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants and victims D are the same residents of the apartment house.

1. On May 11, 2012, Defendant A, who was moving to a restaurant located in the same Dong in the city of Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, to a place for the left in the apartment held in the same Dong, was damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts on the part of Defendant A, stating that the victim D did not have any fact.

3. Defendant B, around May 29, 2012, at the time of Kimhae-si’s council of occupants’ representatives, the Defendant completed the council of occupants’ representatives even though the victim D did not have such fact, and thereby, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts at the location where several Dong representatives and occupants were located. The Defendant: (a) “The president has been drinking at a place where Domine is and was at the place where Domine is and was at the place where several Dong representatives and occupants were located.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. Application of each of the police interrogation protocol to the Defendants as to the contents of each protocol

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.