Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 200,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are married couple.

1. On October 30, 2013, at around 21:05, Defendant A, at the window of Changwon-si, had a reasonable appraisal of the victim F and noise problems residing in front of the D (E apartment guard room). While the security guards hear, Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out false information by saying, “picker is treated as a satho (psych), a mental therapy, and a prisoner of war was satiseed, and fatched, and sent a satis and a new satis.”

2. Defendant B, at around 21:23 on the same day as the above paragraph (1) above, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “pickers (psychopaths), sychopaths after treatment of mental illness, eating drugs after eating them, and viewing them at night at night.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (the second court date)

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders.