logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.30 2017고단3880
사기
Text

Defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months for each of the crimes listed in the order of 2017, the order of 2018, the order of 200, the order of 2018, the order of 200, the order of 2018.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in Daegu District Court and racing support, and on October 16, 2016, the sentence became final and conclusive on December 16, 2016.

[2017 Highest 3880] On November 3, 2016, the Defendant was awarded a subcontract from F to the “F corporation” office of the Defendant’s operation “F corporation”, and the victim E (50). “F corporation is carrying out H 2 factory construction works from G at the time of racing, and our company was awarded a subcontract from F.

I would like to pay in cash the construction cost by receiving the work cost from F on the face of the main place of delivery of the steel products.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was not a FF corporation with respect to the above H H H H H H H 2 factory construction, but entered into a sub-subcontract contract with I, which was entered into with the said F corporation. At the time of entering into the contract with the victim, the above company of the Defendant’s management was unable to pay personnel expenses to its employees, and it was difficult for the victim to the extent that all of the construction expenses paid by the said I was planned to discharge other obligations, such as personnel expenses, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the victim for steel products supply

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received steel products, such as “H-BEAM SS400” equivalent to KRW 33,387,937 at the market price around November 4, 2016 from the injured party. From that time, until December 16, 2016, the Defendant was supplied with steel products totaling KRW 138,287,721 at 11 times in total, as follows, from December 16, 2016.

[200] On November 2016, the Defendant would pay the victim J within 2-3 days of delivery of the sn beamline 11.22 tons to the victim J at the H construction site where the Defendant, who is in G, was in need of construction in the middle and middle of the year 2016.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant was liable for a debt equivalent to KRW 220,000,00,000, such as the unpaid construction materials.

arrow