A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the representative of the personal business chain C, who supplies steel products, such as hacks, covers, Brackers, and V, which are parts for electric vehicles and armored vehicles, was in charge of various contractual affairs, such as supply contracts, and quality inspections, with the said Defense Acquisition Program Administration.

On the other hand, on April 27, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration for the supply of items 143, et al. to KRW 219,134,850, and thereafter, he/she entered into a purchase contract with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration by June 24, 2013, and immediately after entering into each contract, he/she submitted a business quality assurance plan to the Defense Technology and Quality Agency.

However, although the Defendant issued a test report issued by a public institution with respect to the original materials of the goods supplied by C as stated in the above “business quality assurance plan” and submitted it to the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance, the Defendant, using a separate test report not related to the actual supply items, forged as if the actual supply items were the test report or modified the test report issued by the actual supply items, submitted it to the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance, and received the inspection and supply report from the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance and Technology,

1. Forgery of private documents, uttering of falsified investigation documents, interference with business, and fraud;

A. On May 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at C office located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, the Defendant could not deliver the product because the test report on the Bracked Raw Materials, which is the part of the Brackk, was not available; (b) then, the Defendant copied the test report (number E) on the metal test report (AC4C) in the name of the president of the Korea Testing and Research Institute for Chemical Convergence (AC), which is not the test report on the Bracked Raw Materials, which is the actual supply item, to slicker; and (c) then using the computer screen program to “E” from “E” to “F”; and (d) the date of completion of the test from “04 April 15, 2013.”