1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts are found to be of no dispute between the parties or of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including paper numbers) by integrating the purpose of the entire pleadings:

A. M, N,O, and P completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 8, 1929, each of 1/4 shares on the grounds of sale on March 15, 1929 with respect to Q2,378 square meters prior to Q in Chungcheongnam-si and 363 square meters prior to R (hereinafter “instant land”).

(P) On June 10, 1949, upon the death of S, completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 26, 2009 by reason of inheritance by consultation and division.

The Republic of Korea (the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, hereinafter the same shall apply) has completed the registration of ownership transfer on the basis of consultation on public land, around February 3, 2009, with respect to M and N shares, with respect to Q 2,378 square meters prior to Q in Chungcheongnam-si, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 22, 2010 due to expropriation on March 10, 2010.

C. Korea completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 25, 2009 with respect to the S Shares, on the ground of a consultation on public land acquisition on May 25, 2009, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 10, 2010 due to expropriation on October 18, 2010, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the N Shares on October 18, 2010.

On March 26, 2010, the Republic of Korea deposited 19,915,750 won each of the compensation amounting to the respective shares of M and N, among Q2,378 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si, Q. 2,378 square meters, as M and N, respectively.

(No. 316, 317 of 2010). e. this Court

On October 12, 2010, the Republic of Korea deposited 2,604,520 won each of the compensation amounting to the respective shares of M and N in T 363 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si, T. 363 square meters, M and N, respectively.

(F) M was dead on March 8, 1952, N on March 27, 1968, respectively, and the Defendants are M and N’s successors.

2. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion was established on December 17, 1995 by the clans rules, and until now, the plaintiff is a clan, and the plaintiff is M, N,O, and P with the land of this case on March 15, 1929.