Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

Ⅰ Summary of the facts charged

1. Defendant A, under a contract with C, has overall control over the production of so-called historical documentary records video works “D1 – E” (hereinafter “the instant video works”) and compilation of video works. Defendant B, as the head of the video team, participated in the composition of contents, such as organizing a scenario with Defendant A and preparing a scenario, etc., assisting production through data collection, interview, etc., and holding a master director of the instant video works, taking charge of the production of posters and holding a society.

2. From August 201, the Defendants conspired to plan and produce DNA video works consisting of “D 1 parts - E” and “D 2 parts - F” from around August 201.

Defendant

A prepared a scenario draft, and Defendant B produced D video works including the instant video works containing the negative descriptions of the G former president, by examining the content of the scenario draft prepared by Defendant A or supplementing some content.

On November 26, 2012, the Defendants screened the instant video works produced as above to the participants in the City Council of Video Works held in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. From around November 26, 2012, the Defendants distributed the instant video works to the public by open them to the public via the Internet, including J, in the presence of approximately three hundred citizens.

3. 사자( 死者) 명예훼손 사실 G(1965. 7. 19. 사망) 전 대통령은 ① 1920년 6 월경 샌 프란시스 코에서, 부도덕한 성관계를 목적으로 여자를 데리고 주 경계선을 넘는 것을 불법으로 규정한 맨 법 (The Mann Act) 위반으로 미국 수사관들에게 체포되거나, 여성인 ‘K’ 과 함께 범인 식별용 얼굴 사진[ 소위 ‘ 머그 샷’ (Mug Shot)] 을 찍힌 다음 미국 수사관들 로부터 집중조사를 받은 사실이 전혀 없었다.

(2) The first violation of the law.