1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 9,519,329 on the Plaintiff, and KRW 5% per annum from August 23, 2018 to December 12, 2019, and the next day.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On July 20, 2018, the Plaintiff suffered an accident that covers the left-hand trees from the stairs around July 20, 2018, and the same year

8. 2. The same month when he/she was diagnosed by the outside side satise of the left satise at C Hospital, and was hospitalized on the left-hand bridge from the 6th day of the same month;

9. The discharge was made.

(2) On the 10th day of the same month, the Plaintiff, who is a medical doctor at home, was hospitalized in E-Medical Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) operated jointly with D and received treatment to discharge from Korea on the 23th day of the same month. In order to discharge from Korea on the 23th day of the same month, the Plaintiff was subject to the removal of the degree course at home (hereinafter “instant treatment”).

(3) While F, the chief of the original department of the instant hospital, by using an industrial cutting machine, was removed from the Plaintiff’s left-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-up

(4) The Plaintiff was hospitalized in G Hospital on the same day as of August 23, 2018.

9.3. On two occasions, a person was discharged on September 13, 2018, from the hospital on the left side of the hospital on September 13, 2018. The size of each 10cm x 0.5cm and 7cm x 0.5cm x 0.5cm x 0.5cm.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and the result of the physical examination commission to the director of the Jeonnam University Hospital in this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, even though the instant procedure is not a procedure that can be performed by a non-medical person, the Defendant, a non-medical person, neglected to allow F to conduct the instant procedure or F to conduct the instant procedure, and as a result, the Plaintiff was involved in the instant accident, it is reasonable to deem that the instant accident is the Defendant’s negligence in the Defendant’s procedure or its tort liability as an employer against F.