logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단4306
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bus B.

On August 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:20, while driving the vehicle at around 10:20, the Defendant proceeded along the intersection in front of the Ulsan District located in the 63-ro of Gwangju Northernbuk-gu with one lane between the two-lanes from the offline of the library without a view to modern apartment protection.

At all times, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the signal and to prevent the accident by properly examining the front, rear and left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and followed the Defendant’s vehicle front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(72 tax) (72) who was driven by the Defendant in front of the left side of the D-car driven by the Defendant’s vehicle, on the face of the front apartment in Korea’s park by negligence going against the red signal, in contravention of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (V) who was on board the victim’s vehicle for about 6-7 weeks in need of approximately 12 weeks in light of the above occupational negligence, such as finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the photographic image of black stuffs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the fact that the victim C suffered 12 weeks injury due to the Defendant’s crime of this case, the liability for the crime is not exceptionally applied.

However, relief measures such as the defendant's reflection of the crime, reporting to 119 immediately after the accident, are sent after the accident.

arrow