The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of the legal principle) is not inconsistent with objective facts, and it can be recognized that the defendant's statement was contrary to memory by the defendant's original statement that reversed the defendant. However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the charges of false accusation in this case is erroneous by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected

2. Determination

A. On May 3, 2013, the gist of the facts charged is that the defendant appeared as a witness of the above court 2012 high-level 1265 high-level c, etc. at the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and took an oath, and the prosecutor stated "I do not know that I would like to say "I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I will not know that I would like to know that I would like to say, "I would not know that I would not know that I would like to know that I would like to know," and "I would not know that I would like to know "I will not know that I would like to know that I will not have a telephone number" and "I would not know that I would have to know that I will not have a telephone number I will have to know."